What Is the Covenant in Genesis 17?

What Did King James Take Out of the Bible?

What Did King James Take Out of the Bible?Contrary to popular belief, King James did not personally remove any books from the Bible. The King James Version (KJV), completed in 1611, was a translation authorized by King James I of England. It included the Apocrypha, a collection of books found in the Septuagint but not in the Hebrew Bible. These books were later excluded from many Protestant Bibles.The Role of the ApocryphaThe Apocrypha includes books like Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, and 1 and 2 Maccabees. While included in early editions of the KJV, these books were placed in a separate section, reflecting Protestant views that they were valuable but not divinely inspired.Why Were the Books Removed?During the Reformation, reformers like Martin Luther questioned the Apocrypha's authority. By the 19th century, many Protestant publishers omitted these books entirely, leaving them in Catholic and Orthodox Bibles.Legacy of the KJVThe King James Bible remains one of the most influential translations, known for its literary beauty and theological impact, shaping Christian thought and culture for centuries.

Did Jesus Have Children?

Did Jesus Have Children?No, the Bible provides no evidence that Jesus had any biological children. His mission was focused entirely on His divine purpose of bringing salvation to humanity, not on establishing a biological lineage. Claims suggesting otherwise are speculative and lack scriptural or historical support.Biblical EvidenceJesus’ Singleness: The Gospels consistently present Jesus as unmarried and without children. His life was wholly dedicated to His ministry, as seen in His statement in Luke 9:58: "The Son of man hath not where to lay his head."Spiritual Family: Jesus emphasized spiritual relationships over biological ones. In Matthew 12:49-50, He said: "Behold my mother and my brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother."Speculative Claims: Some fictional works and theories suggest that Jesus had a secret family, but these are not supported by biblical or historical evidence.ConclusionJesus did not have biological children. His focus was on His redemptive mission and forming a spiritual family of believers, rather than on establishing a physical lineage.

Why God’s Existence Is Not Special Pleading

Why God’s Existence Is Not Special Pleading When discussing the existence of God, one common objection raised is that the argument for God's existence constitutes "special pleading." This accusation implies that the argument for God’s existence is a double standard, where the existence of God is treated differently from the existence of anything else. However, there are several reasons why God’s existence is not special pleading but rather a valid subject of philosophical inquiry and debate. The Nature of the Argument for God’s Existence Special pleading occurs when one applies a standard or rule to everything except for a particular case without justification. However, the argument for the existence of God is based on a different framework than that used for finite beings or physical objects. The existence of God is a metaphysical question, whereas the existence of finite things is a question of empirical evidence. God, by definition, is the necessary and eternal being whose existence does not depend on anything else, while all created things have contingent existence. The Cosmological Argument One of the most well-known arguments for the existence of God is the cosmological argument, which posits that the universe must have had a cause. The argument suggests that everything in the universe has a cause, but this chain of causes cannot go back infinitely. Therefore, there must be a first cause—God. This argument does not fall under special pleading because it applies the same principle of causality that we use to understand the world, but extends it to the origin of the universe. The cause of the universe, being necessary and uncaused, is distinct from the causes of finite things. The Teleological Argument The teleological argument, or the argument from design, suggests that the order and complexity of the universe point to an intelligent designer. This argument is not special pleading because it uses the same reasoning that we apply when identifying design in human creations, such as buildings or machinery. The complexity of the universe, far beyond anything that humans can create, suggests a purposeful and intelligent creator. In this case, the argument for God’s existence follows the same principles of reasoning used to recognize design in the world, but applied to the cosmos as a whole. The Ontological Argument The ontological argument is another philosophical argument for God’s existence, which asserts that the very concept of a perfect God implies His existence. This argument does not involve special pleading because it is based on logical principles that apply universally. If we can conceive of a perfect being, then that being must exist in reality, because existence is a necessary attribute of perfection. While this argument is debated, it is still a legitimate philosophical argument and is not based on special pleading. Conclusion God’s existence is not special pleading because the arguments for His existence are based on valid philosophical principles that apply universally, whether to the cause of the universe, the design of the cosmos, or the nature of perfection. These arguments provide a rational basis for belief in God, grounded in metaphysical reasoning rather than arbitrary exceptions.

What Does the Bible Say About Premarital Sex?

What Does the Bible Say About Premarital Sex?The Bible is clear in its teachings regarding sexual purity and the context in which sexual intimacy should occur. Premarital sex is considered a sin in Scripture, as it goes against God’s design for marriage and the sanctity of the marriage covenant.Fornication is a SinIn 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, Paul lists fornication among the sinful behaviors that prevent people from inheriting the kingdom of God. Fornication, which includes premarital sex, is seen as a sin against the body and a violation of God’s commands for purity and holiness.Marriage is the Proper ContextIn Hebrews 13:4, the Bible says, "Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge." Sexual intimacy is a gift from God, meant to be enjoyed within the bounds of marriage. Premarital sex undermines the sacredness of this gift and the covenant of marriage.Why This MattersPremarital sex is a violation of God’s design for human sexuality. The Bible calls believers to pursue purity and honor God's design for relationships, saving sexual intimacy for the marriage covenant.